Showing posts with label depravity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label depravity. Show all posts

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Tip Toe through the TULIP


I jokingly call myself a “Recovering Lutheran.” I grew up in the Lutheran church, and I still hold their traditions and teachings in very high regard. Luther was easy to like. After all, he drank a lot of beer and sang bar songs. He was a married monk.  When I went to Seminary I was exposed to some different theology and some different theologians. I remember learning about Calvin’s views, and the TULIP mnemonic and thinking “Yeah, not a big fan of that Calvin dude. I’ll just call myself a 4-point Calvinist. Or maybe just 3.”

And then I joined the Reformed Church in America (RCA). Something like 399% of Reformed churches and theologians consider themselves to be 5-point Calvinists. So you see my problem. God has a funny sense of humor.

For those not fully baptized (ha! get it?) in the Reformed tradition, TULIP stands for the 5 major points of John Calvin’s theology. Calvin was a religious reformer in the 1500’s, and he wrote extensively on theology. (And I do mean extensively – his Institutes of Christian Religion has 80 chapters!) Someone thought it would be easier to remember what Calvin taught if it was in some sort of handy mnemonic device that was easily remembered – a nursery rhyme, perhaps. The little sing-song-ditty didn’t catch on, mainly because it’s very difficult to rhyme words like Depravity and Atonement. So they came up with “TULIP” instead. It stands for Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints. Cute, huh?
So, let’s take a look at Total Depravity. Basically this means that because of our fall into sin, human beings are horrible, nasty, depraved, disgusting, perverted, hopeless creatures that can barely pull themselves out of their own muck and mire – but only to throw rocks at other people. Calvin was known to have used phrases like “totally depraved” and “utterly perverse.” In other words, people suck.

 I had a problem with this concept. I mean, are all people totally depraved? I thought that was a bit of a stretch.

 “Sure, some people are depraved,” I said to my Seminary professor, “I mean, Caligula and Hitler – I think we can agree they were totally depraved. Charles Manson and Jeffrey Dahmer, sure. But Everyone? Totally? Come on! I know some really nice people!”

My professor said, “Nice doesn’t get you into heaven. Watch the news; then we’ll talk.”

Well, OK then. I watched the news. I also watched the History channel and TMZ so I could get the full picture. TMZ makes some pretty good arguments for Total Depravity.

 But I dug even deeper. I read the newspaper. I spoke with people. I prayed.  I was forced to come to grips with humanity’s sad history of torturing, raping, and pillaging one another. Much of the “history” isn’t so historic. I read about men forbidding women to work outside their homes, forbidding girls to get an education or have a choice in whom or when they marry, citing “their culture” and I shook my head. I puzzled over seemingly senseless wars in all corners of the world. I was dumbstruck by the universal pervasiveness of child porn.  I became outraged over the stories of the Arizona parents who locked their kid in a trunk – on purpose – as a punishment for stealing a Popsicle! Or the guy who shot and killed his neighbors’ entire family because their dog was barking. And then there were the politicians. I was undone.

 OK, my professor was right. People suck.

 I found this really amusing Tumblr that summed it up nicely:

So maybe I can begin to accept Calvin’s doctrine of Total Depravity. But I am also a HUGE proponent of grace! This is a conundrum. I know Calvin must have talked about grace somewhere in the myriad of writings he left. He did write about Irresistible Grace, but that was referring more to how God draws us into relationship, not necessarily the “overflowing love and mercy” kind of grace I’m thinking of.  There was much discussion of “God’s common grace” by followers of Calvin and later Reformed theologians. Common grace being the love and mercy which God bestows on all of creation and all people, just because. Grace flows because of God’s very nature. You know, “God is love” and all that. The Bible is pretty clear that God loves people.

 True Calvinists maintain that God’s common grace does nothing to improve our unregenerate nature, and it doesn’t improve our ability to change our moral standing before God. Huh.

 “But people were created in the image of God,” I argued, “It simply doesn’t make sense to ONLY say that people are totally depraved! That would imply that the Creator was also depraved!”

Calvin would roll over in his grave if that were the accepted logical conclusion. There is much more to it than that.

OK, so humans are created in the Image of God, and that’s good. But because of the fall, we’ve been relegated to the scratch-and-dent category (there’s the depravity) That’s bad. God clearly loves us and has forgiven us – isn’t that what the gospel is about?! And that’s good. Paul was always going on about how God “remembers our sin no more.” And once we are “in Christ, we are new creations.” And we “can do all things through Christ,” and so on. All good.  That doesn’t sound like much Total Depravity to me.

So, which is it? Are we worms? We cannot be just despicable, perverted worms. God doesn’t seem interested in developing relationships with worms. God loves people. God has been trying to develop relationships with people since we first became human! (see Genesis 1 and 2) And God wants a relationship with us – certainly not because of our depravity, and not in spite of it either. Perhaps God loves us just the way we are because that’s who God is…and by God’s Grace we are forgiven and loved and lifted up and empowered. When God looks at us, God sees us as capable, much-loved children, right? When Jesus was walking the earth, He assured us we can do whatever He did and more!

 We’re Worms with Superpowers!

 Now that’s a concept that requires more thought. I need to revisit the other parts of TULIP as well.  Stay tuned…

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

I'm right and you're $#*%)#!

I had a very interesting discussion yesterday with Junior, our housemate. He's only 21, but I think he has "an old soul."

Junior was lamenting the lack of civility and common decency displayed by his generation. (Yes, he actually referred to people his own age as "this generation.") He decided that just because we can put everything out there on Facebook or Twitter, doesn't mean we ought to. And just because we can comment or make [disparaging] remarks about someone's posts or photos or status updates, doesn't mean it's the smartest thing to do. Whatever happened to conversation? Whatever happened to kindness? This was refreshing to hear from a 21-year-old.

At first we thought it might be the internet that gives us this feeling of anonymity; it's a way to put our opinions out there without the responsibility of actually having a face-to-face conversation.
"I've said my piece, I don't have to listen to, or read, yours and that's the end of it. Ha! So there!"
But it isn't just the internet that gives people the idea that they have license to say whatever they want - there is this idea roaming around that words, beliefs and thoughts have no consequences. 
"After all, I have the right to free speech, right? I have the right to believe whatever I want, right? And if my beliefs have no consequences, then my beliefs are correct, and therefore my beliefs are THE TRUTH. And if my beliefs are THE TRUTH, then everyone in the world should agree with me and abide by my truth." 
It's a twisted logic, and it's dangerous.

At the dangerous end of the spectrum are the people who want to tell everyone else what to do, how to think, and how to live. They think their belief - their "truth" - is the only truth, and somehow God has given them the task of enforcing it. We all know who they are...the folks that picket funerals, the guys that shoot girls in the head because they dare to want an education, people that flip you off on the highway, or guys who want to make sure we all carry our birth certificates in order to use the proper restroom. It doesn't seem to occur to them that they might be wrong.

At the other end of the spectrum are those of us who shake our heads in disbelief and wonder, What on earth are they thinking?

So here's an idea: Let's have a civil conversation. With both parties actually listening to the other side. We don't have to agree on everything. In fact, we might just agree to disagree. We might learn something, or see an issue from a new angle. And we can even respect one another as people! Now there's an idea with consequences!

"If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." 
Romans 12:18